Economic Lever
Economic levers are a group of financial policy strategies that jurisdictions can use to incentivize resilient design.
Potential Policy Areas
Monetary Incentives
Monetary incentives including grants and tax abatements can help promote building retrofits to safeguard against future climate disasters, and can be administered through the State, municipality, or a region's utility (PG&E).
Benefits & Function
Building retrofits can reduce future risk of flood damage and sea level rise impacts. Buildings will also be better suited for extreme weather events. In the long run, these policies will save money by increasing property value, decreasing risks, and increasing insurance coverage.
Considerations
When elevating structures on fill or piles it is efficient to elevate smaller, shorter structures rather than taller ones. In seismically active zones, certain buildings will not be able to be raised. Elevating buildings is considered a short term solution. When flood proofing, maintenance is required every few years due to leaks. Green facades may only work on structurally secure buildings.
Uses for Policy
Existing, Redevelopment
Open Space Preservation and Conservation Easements
This strategy focuses on the conservation and potential public acquisition of undeveloped land to lessen or prevent the impacts of flooding on a community’s assets.
Benefits & Function
Conservation easements allow for long-term preservation of ecologically important areas, while providing flexibility for each property.
Considerations
However it may occur, land acquisition strategies can be challenging in areas experiencing high development pressure. For municipalities experiencing growth, the cost of the outright purchase of land may be out of reach, especially along the coast.
Land acquisition as a flood management strategy is most effective on a large scale, though targeted acquisition of flood prone parcels or areas that are likely to flood in the near future can effectively mitigate some flood impacts. This strategy tends to be most suitable for ex-urban, suburban, or rural locations vulnerable to flooding with large amounts of open space. The practice may be more difficult for urban areas with developed waterfronts that may have lost habitat and natural coastal features. However, some larger cities have had success reclaiming and revitalizing former landfills and wetlands.
Uses for Policy
Non-developed land
Special Assessments and Taxes
Taxes can provide municipalities with consistent funding for implementation as well as operations and maintenance costs of nature-based flooding solutions through incentives and disincentives for various land uses and the location of development.
Benefits & Function
Special Assessment Districts can pool resources for adaptation efforts that would otherwise not be deployed in a coordinated effort.
Considerations
Tax policy will ideally be applied in a comprehensive rather than a piecemeal way within a large jurisdiction to help ensure equitable payment for resilience benefits and to ensure that public resources serve a broad public purpose instead of socializing private flood protection costs. In California, under Proposition 218 and other voter approved measures, new fees and taxes are typically subject to voter approval, and require approval from two-thirds of those who will be assessed.
Uses for Policy
N/A
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District and Climate Resilience District
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts (EIFDs) and Climate Resilience Districts are tools to fund economic development and resilience projects, respectively, within a geographic boundary utilizing tax increment financing.
Benefits & Function
EIFDs and Climate Resilience Districts provide strong revenue streams for projects that may otherwise not be feasible.
Considerations
EIFDs and Climate Resilience Districts typically take 1-2 years to establish. EIFDs do not require voter approval to form, however, a 55% voter approval is required for the EIFDs issuance of bonds.
Uses for Policy
New, Redevelopment
Transfer of Development Rights
Through the transfer of development rights (TDR), local governments allow the selling and purchasing of development credits to support smart growth and infill development in denser areas away from high-hazard areas.
Benefits & Function
TDR programs can be more readily supported by developers, as there is no loss of developable area and no additional requirements. As an additional benefit, it can also contribute to a more diverse housing stock with greater percentage of affordable housing due to additional density allowances and other monetary development benefits.
Considerations
TDRs programs may be complicated to set up and to administer, especially in an environment where “receiving” areas may be hard to find or designate. Because they are voluntary, they might not work as designed if sellers are unwilling to participate.
Uses for Policy
New Development
Buyout
Buyouts employ public funds to remove development from repeat-hazard areas, to reduce future property damage and to promote public safety.
Benefits & Function
Buyouts are an effective tool to remove existing buildings in high-risk areas.
Considerations
Buyouts as a mechanism for managed retreat can be a hot-button item and garner community opposition. If buyouts are implemented voluntarily and not everyone participates, they may create a “checkerboard effect” making complete retreat difficult. This may also limit reuse of the land for other resilience strategies such as a floodplain buffer. Mandatory buyouts, or eminent domain, may be used to prevent immediate health, safety, and life risks, but are typically not eligible for cost-sharing by the federal government so are much more expensive and difficult. Leasebacks are buyout programs in which properties are leased to their current owners for a specified period so that they can continue to use them without economic loss.
Uses for Policy
Existing
Policy Examples
Please note that links in "Go to Example" lead to an external website.
Old Town and Packing District EIFD
Placentia, CA
In Old Town Placentia, CA, the City, working alongside the County, established an EIFD spurred by a plan to develop a new Metrolink station and parking structure. The City created a public financing authority to oversee establishment of the EIFD and the use of its funds. The financing authority also issues bonds for the EIFD.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC retroFIT Floodproofing Grant
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg retroFIT floodproofing grant in North Carolina covers up to 95% of eligible mitigation project costs for commercial and residential owners with buildings in the floodplain, using stormwater utility fees. Financial grants are available to reimburse 75-95% of eligible expenses for qualified floodproofing projects. The program is intended to assist floodplain property owners who may not currently be served by other mitigation efforts (e.g. creek restoration/mitigation projects and buyout programs) and are at risk for future flood losses.
Green Roof Tax Abatement Program
New York City
New York City requires all new buildings and most major roof renovations to install green roofs, solar panels, or a combination of the two across most of the roof area, defined as a “sustainable roofing zone.” NYC’s Mayor’s Office of Long Term Planning and Sustainability has established rules that designate certain city Community Districts as Priority Zones for the Green Roof Tax Abatement program. Green roofs installed in these areas will be eligible for a $15 per square foot property tax abatement – nearly triple the base abatement. Elsewhere, the level of the incentive in the city will remain at $5.23 per square foot.
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
Placentia, CA
In Old Town Placentia, CA, the City, working alongside the County, established an EIFD spurred by a plan to develop a new Metrolink station and parking structure. The City created a public financing authority to oversee establishment of the EIFD and the use of its funds. The financing authority also issues bonds for the EIFD.
Iowa Flood Mitigation Board
Iowa
In Iowa, the state Flood Mitigation Board relies in part on an incremental increase in the state sales tax to raise funds for flood mitigation projects. The board was created in 2013 and, as of their 2015 annual report, had approved nearly $600 M in flood reduction projects.